GOVERNOR-Morgan Bruce Reeves-44/44, Nikki R. Haley-3127, Vincent A. Sheheen-4621

LT. GOVERNOR-Ken Ard-3462, Ashley Cooper-4310

SECRETARY OF STATE-Mark Hammond-3668, Marjorie L. Johnson-4060

STATE TREASURER-Curtis Loftis-4150

ATTORNEY GENERAL-Leslie Minerd-75, Alan Wilson-2989, Matthew Richardson-4708

COMPTROLLER GENERAL-Richard Eckstrom-3303, Robert Barber-4428

STATE SUPERINTENDENT OF EDUCATION-Dorethea A. Bull-84, Mick Zais-3107, Tim Moultrie-166, Frank Holleman-4313, Tony Fayyazi-67

ADJUTANT GENERAL-Bob Livingston-4140

COMMISSIONER OF AGRICULTURE-Hugh Weathers-3614, Tom E. Elliott-4150

U.S. SENATE-Tom Clements-274, Jim DeMint-3785, Alvin M. Greene-3658

U.S. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES (District 5)-Mick Mulvaney-3387, John Spratt-4433

STATE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES (District 55)-Jackie E. Hayes-6365

PROBATE JUDGE-Teresa Campbell-6528

CORONER-Donnie Grimsley-6720

COUNTY AUDITOR-Kay S. McKenzie-6660

COUNTY TREASURER-Jamie Calhoun Estes-6700

SOIL AND WATER DISTRICT COMMISSION-Keith Allen-2969, Carl S. Coleman-1853

COUNTY COUNCIL DISTRICT 5- Harold Moody-958

COUNTY COUNCIL DISTRICT 6-Andrew Deboy Graves-674

COUNTY COUNCIL DISTRICT 7-Joe Johnson-1098

Constitutional Amendment Questions

Amendment 1
Must Article I of the Constitution of this State, relating to the declaration of rights under the state’s constitution, be amended by adding Section 25 so as to provide that hunting and fishing are valuable parts of the state’s heritage, important for conservation, and a protected means of managing nonthreatened wildlife; to provide that the citizens of South Carolina shall have the right to hunt, fish, and harvest wildlife traditionally pursued, subject to laws and regulations promoting sound wildlife conservation and management as prescribed by the General Assembly; and to specify that this section must not be construed to abrogate any private property rights, existing state laws or regulations, or the state’s sovereignty over its natural resources?

Explanation
A ‘Yes’ vote will make it a constitutional right for citizens to hunt and fish and will permit the State to legally provide for proper wildlife management and the protection of private property rights.
Yes-6047,  No-532

Amendment 2
Must Article II of the Constitution of this State, relating to the right of suffrage, be amended by adding Section 12 so as to provide that the fundamental right of an individual to vote by secret ballot is guaranteed for a designation, a selection, or an authorization for employee representation by a labor organization?

Explanation
A ‘Yes’ vote will give employees the constitutional right to vote by secret ballot when they are voting on whether to be represented by a labor union.
Yes-5629, No-804

Amendment 3
Must Section 36(A), Article III of the Constitution of this State be amended so as to increase from three to five percent in increments of one-half of one percent over four fiscal years the amount of state general fund revenue in the latest completed fiscal year required to be held in the General Reserve Fund?

Explanation
A ‘Yes’ vote will increase the amount of money state government must keep in the General Reserve Fund (its “rainy day” fund) from 3% of the previous year’s revenue to 5% of the previous year’s revenue.
Yes- 4777, No-1665

Amendment 4
Must Section 36(B), Article III of the Constitution of this State be amended so as to provide that monies from the Capital Reserve Fund first must be used, to the extent necessary, to fully replenish the applicable percentage amount in the General Reserve Fund?

Explanation
A ‘Yes’ vote will require that the Capital Reserve Fund’s first priority is to replenish the State’s General Reserve Fund (its “rainy day” fund) instead of serving to offset midyear budget cuts at state agencies.
Yes-4957, No-1440

The Local Questions

County Board of Education Referendum
Do you favor the Dillon County Board of Education elected?
Yes-6071
No-737

Referendum To Dissolve Maple Swamp Watershed Conservation District
(only some precincts will vote on this)
Should the Maple Swamp Watershed Conservation District having met all obligations be dissolved?
Maple Swamp Watershed was formed in 1962 to solve an identified problem in the community flood prevention and drainage. A board of directors who are elected on a nonpartisan basis for a four-year term governs the watershed district. The watershed board was formed to assist in implementing and operating the watershed district. This board has been inactive for many years and serves no useful purpose since this watershed has been completed for over 40 years.
The Dillon Soil and Water conservation District has received petitions from registered voters residing in the watershed district to dissolve the watershed district board. The Conservation District has determined that all obligations of the watershed have been met and followed the policy according to the South Carolina Code of Laws Chapter 48-11-190 for placing this referendum on the ballot to dissolve the watershed district board. The Dillon Soil and Water Conservation District supports this referendum to dissolve the Watershed Board.
Vote YES to dissolve the watershed district.
Vote NO to not dissolve the watershed district.

Yes-732, No-212